TIME [ 1400 ] [ GAI.01/30P/A13-001 ]
ITURRALDE: A POSSIBLE IMPACT STRUCTURE AT THE EDGE OF THE AMAZON IN NORTHERN BOLIVIA
Peter WASILEWSKI(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center)
Gunther KLETETSCHKA(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center)
Compton TUCKER ( NASA Goddard Space Flight Center )
Tim KILLEEN ( Conservation International )
The Iturralde structure is possibly the Earth's most recent ″big″ impact event recording a collision with a meteor or comet that might have occurred between 11,000 and 30,000 years ago. The most convincing evidence for the existence of a crater comes from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) image of the structure. The feature appears as a quasi-circular closed depression about 20 meters in depth resembling a cookie cutter cutting heavily vegetated soft sediments and pampas at the edge of the Bolivian Amazon. A barometric traverse from inside the crater to outside the rim supports the 20 meter depth contrast suggested by the SRTM data.A magnetic survey across the crater was able to define a symmetry along an east-west axis with the center being lower than the rim. Base station records were able to identify the Equatorial Electrojet (EEJ) geomagnetic diurnal signal attributed to a narrow electric current sheet flowing eastward along the magnetic dip equator. The soil magnetic susceptibility remains low and featureless until about 1 meter depth where lateritic nodules identifiable with the downward migration of iron are found. As yet there are no identifiable evidences of shocked quartz in the quartz sand collected in soil pits inside the crater, along river cuts, and at the ″rim″. The expedition did not yield the ″smoking gun″ required for verification.There does exist oil exploration geophysical survey data ( gravity, magnetics) which include the Iturralde structure in the survey areas and there are seismic lines near the structure. We hope to be able to obtain this information perhaps by presentation time. The vegetation inside the crater appears different from that outside the crater but this may simply reflect the inundated nature of the depressed structure which may be underwater for a good portion of the rainy season. A return to the structure to drill for evidence of shocked material may be the only way to prove that the structure is a crater.