Staň se ! (Everything Possible 2)

All the modern history of mankind goes along its need for understanding the natural patterns. Although we control most of the living nature, there is still no escape from the restrictions of the laws of physics and other principal limitations. This essay discusses the possibility of breaking or changing these laws and of creating new possibilities by realizing there is no independent outer reality in comparison to our inner subjective worlds. And if we accept the possibility that we are gently co-creating and co-changing the whole world including its history (as well as we are changed by it, too), we can draw conclusions from it, which might be far beyond our today's life experience. All this has much to do with apparently incompatible worlds of our real life and our fantasies. But aren't these two worlds virtually two different views of the same simple existence ? Is there a paradigm of all other paradigms ? Are we in fact the God for whom we are searching through tens or hundreds of thousands of years and who is very different from all we are used to accredit to him ?

March 14th, 2018

March 14th, 2018:

  • Albert Einstein's anniversary of birth - 1879
  • Stephen Hawking's day of death - 2018
  • π-day (Pi Day) - since 1998

What a distinct day!

 

My list of non-obvious things

For a very long time I am used to think about a few things, which are well known in the scientific communities, many of them were proved long time ago, but are contradicting the obviousness or are at least non-intuitive. What is obvious or intuitive seems to be very subjective. So this is my point of view and I would be pleased if there are other people having similar tastes.

An ISS and Space Shuttle at the same time with naked eye ?

sky map for STS-133

It was a great moment for me. On Monday, March 7th, 2011 at about 18:50-18:55(CET = GMT+1) I was walking in Zelenec (near Prague, Czech Republic) from the train station to the gym to meet my second son and to go home with him. By walking along the street I noticed a very nice picture on the black sky (of course with much light pollution, but the air is very clean these chilly days and weather is great for stargazing).

Time traveling still could be possible

For decades there are discussions about the (im)possibility of time traveling. We all know that time traveling on the macroscopic scale is by modern science considered to be impossible. The reason is, that by influencing even a single tiny particle in the past would alter the time line and change history. This would result in paradoxes like “how could I exist in my present time if I travel to the past and kill my mother before I am born”. I think, this particular paradox has a logical and valid solution (using many-worlds ideas or accepting self-correcting approach), but there are other, more complicated, where it is not so obvious if they are resolvable, too. They probably don't.

Still, there are at least two possibilities how to accept time traveling in general with no temporal paradoxes at all. And both are very simple to understand. It is possible I am not the first one who invented it, but at least I neither read nor hear these ideas before.

Democratic exposure

Democracy - nearly all of us seem to advocate for this. Most of us would say, that this is the best way of living and existence in society. There were and are wars conducted due to democratic principles and the need of spreading it over the world. Is it really so evident ?

A few notes to the world of Zdeněk Neubauer

Na prvni phled nerozlisujeme podle pritomnosti a nepritomnosti znaku, ale podle celkoveho patternu, ktery jejich kombinaci vznika. Seznam znaku je objektivni, nase vedomi se ale ridi naprosto neobjektivni, jedinecnou kombinaci techto znaku, ktera je pripad od pripadu tim nejpromenlivejsim, co lze na organismu naleznout. Vzhled je neobjektivni, pouze zcasti preveditelny na seznam znaku.

Objektivni neznamena, ze kazdy ma moznost se o tom presvedcit ! To muze udelat jen ten, kdo si osvoji prislusne postupy - prime poznani se tedy tyka skupiny zasvecencu, ktera dane poznani je schopna sdelit vsem ostatnim, byt jde treba o takove banality jako je rotace Zeme. (Mj., Zemi jeste nikdo kolem Slunce obihat nevidel, toto poznani je pouze veci zasveceni ve "cteni" dusledku, ktere z toho vyplyvaji).

Co to vubec znamena, ze neco poznavame ?

Evolution

Evoluce v soucasne biologii znamena viru v to, ze se zivot vyvinul z jednoho spolecneho predka postupnym rozruznovanim populaci a nabiranim novych (pokrokovejsich) znaku. Znakem je tu jakakoliv vlastnost organismu, ktera je geneticky podminena a lze ji vyuzit pro klasifikaci.

Jeste nez si povsineme 'klasickych dukazu evolucni teorie', je dobre si uvedomit, ze soucasna evolucni teorie uz davno neni dilem pana Darwina ....

Why I DO NOT agree with the (planned) US agression against Iraq

Today, March 18th 2003, it seems the war between USA and Iraq is unavoidable. First of all, I am very sorry for all the people which will die and suffer from this. I do not agree with the agression and here is why.

Everything's possible

This article show my streaming thoughts concerning the theme of the capability of human being to move the bounds of its own knowledge forever. This knowledge is later used to manipulate and in long-time-period frame also to completely reassemble the underlying reality. There is no difference between the subjective personality of a human being and a reality fragment. The objective reality is multilayered. The objective reality is fragmented into individual subjective entities which are subject to biology allied sciences.

Pages

Subscribe to David Komanek's WebLand RSS